Practice Recommendations for Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged immobility is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidities in critically ill adults and children. The majority of critically ill children remain immobilized while in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) due to limited awareness of associated morbidities, lack of comfort and knowledge on how to mobilize critically ill children, and the lack of pediatric-specific practice guidelines. The objective of this article was to develop consensus practice recommendations for safe, early mobilization (EM) in critically ill children. A group of 10 multidisciplinary experts with clinical and methodological expertise in physical rehabilitation, EM, and pediatric critical care collaborated to develop these recommendations. First, a systematic review was conducted to evaluate existing evidence on EM in children. Using an iterative process, the working document was circulated electronically to panel members until the group reached consensus. The group agreed that the overall goals of mobilization are to reduce PICU morbidities and optimize recovery. EM should therefore not be instituted in isolation but as part of a rehabilitation care bundle. Mobilization should not be delayed, but its appropriateness and safety should be assessed early. Increasing levels of physical activity should be individualized for each patient with the goal of achieving the highest level of functional mobility that is developmentally appropriate, for increasing durations, daily. We developed a system-based set of clinical safety criteria and a checklist to ensure the safety of mobilization in critically ill children. Although there is a paucity of pediatric evidence on the efficacy of EM, there is ample evidence that prolonged bed rest is harmful and should be avoided. These EM practice recommendations were developed to educate clinicians, encourage safe practices, reduce PICU-acquired morbidities, until future pediatric research provides evidence on effective rehabilitation interventions and how best to implement these in critically ill children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.057 | 0.186 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.015 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".