MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605682426 · doi:10.17559/tv-20170108133334

Hydrological modeling in the Manas River Basin using soil and water assessment tool driven by CMADS

2017· article· en· W2605682426 on OpenAlexaff
Xianyong Meng, Hao Wang, Xiaohui Lei, Siyu Cai, Hongjing Wu, Xiaonan Ji, Jianhua Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTehnicki vjesnik - Technical Gazette · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersState Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinStructural basinWater resource managementSoil and Water Assessment ToolGeologyGeographyStreamflowGeomorphologyCartographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrological simulation in meteorological ungauged areas has always been a difficult problem for the study on atmospheric and hydrological coupling; meanwhile, it is also one of the important factors that restrict model development and basin water resource knowledge. To analyze the mechanism of atmospheric and hydrological coupling, this study quantitatively evaluated water cycle situation in basins covered with glaciers and snow, and chose the Manas River Basin (MRB) in China as the typical research area to verify the adaptability of the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model (CMADS). The SWAT model was firstly built to simulate water resources, then we calibrated the model with CMADS dataset and started localization in the Manas River Basin (MRB), China, and finally calibrated simulated runoff with observed data SWAT-CUP (SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs). In addition, parameter sensitivity analysis, and parameter calibration and validation were also included in the present study. Results showed that the SWAT model could well reproduce the runoff process of two stations (Kenswat and Hongshanzui) in the research area by using data from CMADS. The simulation performed well on monthly scale in both stations, where R 2 = (0,5560,999) and NSE = (0,9370,998), and also showed satisfactory effects, where R 2 = (0,9270,993) and NSE = (0,8360,997).Our research suggests that the SWAT model can show satisfactory results through parameter calibration in areas with high glacial recharge rate. Moreover, CMADS can provide necessary meteorological data for SWAT simulations, and support parameter calibration and historical surface data analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTehnicki vjesnik - Technical GazetteSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207