MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605736070 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56479-5_47

“Obligations and Entitlements”: Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Community Parks

2017· book-chapter· en· W2605736070 on OpenAlexaffabout
Trent Newmeyer

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernmentalityNeoliberalism (international relations)RecreationGrassrootsGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)SociologyPublic relationsPublic administrationPolitical sciencePolitical economyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chapter outlines Michel Foucault’s notion of governmentality—the active production of citizens that are responsible for their own conduct, health, and wellbeing. Governmentality also connects well to the neoliberal shift in the governing of leisure programs: less services offered by the state at the various levels of government, a focus on creating leisure “choices” with user fees and “supporting” leisure choices through tax-credited spending of consumers rather than actual resources for programs. However, rather than viewing these responsible subjects as passive consumers of leisure, they are also capable of taking their leisure into their own hands, challenging authorities’ control and knowledge and creating grassroots programming outside of the profit sector. Through a focus on municipal recreation in Toronto, Canada, the chapter highlights some of the benefits and pitfalls of community organizing self-governing subjects in a neoliberal environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207