Bureaucratic Behavior towards Public Management: The Study of Health Services Free in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Public services in Indonesia in the health sector has not been optimal characterized by complexity of the procedures that experienced, public complaints are still high, and the cost of services is less transparent. The government through bureaucratic reform 2010-2025 Grand Design have established guidelines for the implementation of public services to the world-class public management. The ultimate goal is to improve public services is good and right, improve the quality of policy-making and decision-making, to prevent misuse of authority, and improve resource efficiency. Type of bureaucratic behavior will determine the achievement of bureaucratic reform. Facts and data showing through phenomenology. The data collected with in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation on health services in South Sulawesi indicates that the type of behavior of the bureaucracy in order to realize the reform of the bureaucracy is still in the category of politicians from the four types discussed include the type of employee career, type of politician, professional type, and the type of missionary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".