MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605797823 · doi:10.5006/c2013-02175

Compatibility between Pipeline Anti-corrosion Coating and Thermal Insulator in the Presence of Cathodic Protection

2013· article· en· W2605797823 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodic protectionCorrosionMaterials scienceCoatingCompatibility (geochemistry)Insulator (electricity)ThermalMetallurgyComposite materialElectrochemistryChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper the disbondment characteristics of anti-corrosion coating below an intact insulator at 150 °C have been investigated. The anti-corrosion coating in such situation may be susceptible to water accumulation if the insulator deteriorates elsewhere providing entry point for water and the water subsequently migrates laterally along the pipeline. Under this situation, Cathodic protection (CP) may not reach the steel surface to protect it. To simulate this situation, the cathodic disbondment (CD) test was conducted using a specially designed experimental set up in which the pipe sample was titled to simulate the inclination of pipeline and to facilitate the lateral movement of water. During the test no lateral movement of water beneath an intact insulator was observed for over 150 days and the anticorrosion coating (beneath the intact insulator) did not undergo any change. However, the area of disbondment of anticorrosion coating in the adjacent section that was exposed directly to aqueous phase (i.e., outer insulator and polyethylene layers were removed before the test) was higher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it