Mouvement social gai et luttes institutionnelles : des services sociaux pour les personnes d’orientation homosexuelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur relate l’histoire américaine puis québécoise des démarches entreprises pour faire reconnaître la légitimité de services destinés aux gais et aux lesbiennes aux prises avec des problèmes liés à la perception négative de leur orientation affective/sexuelle et la nécessité de développer des pratiques individuelles et collectives en accord avec une vision de l’homosexualité débarrassée de préjugés. L’accent est mis sur les difficultés rencontrées à faire inscrire dans une institution publique de services sociaux des pratiques professionnelles non discriminatoires et, si nécessaire, des services spécialisés pour les personnes d’orientation homosexuelle. Les groupes autonomes de gais et de lesbiennes jouent un rôle de groupes de pression et parviennent à se faire reconnaître comme interlocuteurs valables auprès des institutions concernées. Des programmes prennent forme, qui répondent à de nombreuses demandes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".