MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606038173 · doi:10.1117/12.2250218

Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics optical coherence tomography for multiphoton retinal imaging (Conference Presentation)

2017· article· en· W2606038173 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel J. Wahl, Michelle Cua, Su-Jin Lee, Stefano Bonora, Robert J. Zawadzki, Yifan Jian, Marinko V. Šarunic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsAdaptive opticsOptical coherence tomographyWavefrontDeformable mirrorScanning laser ophthalmoscopyMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) for in-vivo retinal imaging is an emerging tool for vision science. TPEF has multiple benefits in comparison to conventional confocal fluorescence scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for retinal imaging, including better axial resolution and the ability to use infrared excitation light for imaging the highly photosensitive tissue in the retina. TPEF is very sensitive to the focused spot size, which is enlarged by aberrations induced by the refractive elements of the mouse eye when imaging with a large numerical aperture. Our system begins with a femtosecond pulsed laser for two-photon excitation, which is also sufficiently spectrally broadband to allow for an optical coherence tomography (OCT) sub-system to guide aberration correction. The OCT system operated at 1 volumes/second with our custom GPU accelerated real-time processing. Our lens-based optical design features two deformable elements, one with large stroke for focus control on the retina and the other with multiple actuators for aberration correction. Our wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics (SAO) is driven by a modal search with a sharpness quality metric on the en-face OCT image of the selected retinal layer. After optimization, the speed was increased to 10 fps for TPEF imaging to allow for streaming and averaging ~200 frames per image. To demonstrate the system capabilities, we performed in-vivo retinal fluorescein angiography using TPEF. Our results demonstrate depth-resolved aberration correction with the SAO-OCT to increase the TPEF signal intensity. We also present TPEF at multiple vascular layers in the mouse retina alongside the volumetric OCT to localize the vessels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207