My Beloved is a Bass Line: Musical, "De-colonial" Interventions in Song Criticism and Sacred Erotic Discourse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What meanings might be composed from the Song of Song’s amatory and horticultural language if it is read with a sense of love as irreducibly “de-colonial”? For Chela Sandoval, (2000) ‘true love’ resides in the “double consciousness”, interstitial agency and “tactical sign-reading” with which colonised subjects deconstruct “Euro-American artifacts” like 'love,' 'soul,' 'knowledge' to then redefine them in de-colonial terms. I construct a womanist intertextual matrix for the Song to illustrate how productive this hermeneutic shift might be. In Alice Walker’s search for her foremothers’ gardens (1983), gardens and songs compose an ambivalent metonymic economy. Songs as gardens and gardens as songs trigger haunted longing; they are goads for remembrance, rebellion and public grieving. Toni Morrison’s ‘commentary’ on the Song ( Beloved) circulates similar de-colonial energies. Such intertexts chasten the whiteness not only of earlier resistant readings that mobilised the Song to contest the heteronormative politics of love as a cultural practice, but also 1) Boer’s utopian reading of the Song’s agricultural economy as self-generating plenitude (2007); 2) Black’s construal of the Shulammite’s blackness as a non-racialised opacity that affords romantic agency (2006). De-colonial intertexts beg re-signification of the Song’s musicality, its garden imagery, its female protagonist’s blackness and vineyard migrations in terms that critically intervene in the racial and economic politics of love as a cultural practice. Additionally, given that music figures centrally in Walker’s, Morrisons’s and Sandoval’s genealogies of love, a de-colonial reading of the Song mandates construction of a subaltern musical archive within the Eurocentric discourse of sacred eroticism which the Song subtends as an ur-text: if the Shulammite’s erotic longing and seeking are re-read as de-colonial and “trickster”-esque, she begets a subaltern musical family tree—audible today, I shall argue, in the ‘shulammitc’ bass-playing and protest-singing of Meshell Ndegeocello,.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".