Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelle éducation à la raison dans le monde d’aujourd’hui, pour le monde d’aujourd’hui? Telle est la question centrale de ce texte, qui procède en quatre temps. Après avoir montré que la raison s’entend de diverses manières dans la tradition éducative occidentale, et pris acte ensuite des effets combinés de la critique de l’humanisme universaliste rationaliste, l’auteur propose de fonder cette éducation sur une approche herméneutique et pragmatique de la raison et se montre en particulier sensible à l’interpellation politique qui loge au cœur de la question de l’éducation à la raison. Cette interpellation politique sera caractérisée sous sa forme démocratique moderne. Dans une société démocratique, l’éducation à la raison doit viser l’acquisition de la capacité à discuter, laquelle prend appui sur l’articulation des trois opérations fondamentales de la pratique du langage : la rhétorique, l’herméneutique et la poétique. L’auteur conclut en insistant sur le lien nécessaire entre l’éducation et le politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".