MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2606121086 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.187

Identifying superusers of health services with mental health and addiction problems

2017· article· en· W2606121086 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacqueline Quail, Maureen Anderson, Meriç Osman, Claire de Oliveira, Walter P. Wodchis, Nazeem Muhajarine, Kathie Pruden Nansel, Valerie McLeod, Marilyn Baetz, Gary Teare, Tania Lafontaine, Judy Pelly, Joelle Schaefer, M. N. Baker, Cory Neudorf

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatchewan Health Quality Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthMedicinePublic healthHealth careEnvironmental healthPopulationFamily medicinePsychiatryNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT ObjectiveThe objective of this research is to identify people with mental health and/or addiction (MHA) problems and determine characteristics that led to them becoming a superuser of health services (i.e., the most expensive 10% of all health service users). ApproachIn Saskatchewan, Canada, we used hospital and physician administrative data spanning 2005 to 2014 to identify the MHA cohort. We will calculate total health care costs for each individual and assign them to one of three groups: low cost users (<50th percentile), moderate cost users (50-<90th percentile), and superusers (90th percentile and above). For each group, we will describe sociodemographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and use of health services, and describe their trajectory towards becoming a superuser. Predictors of becoming a superuser will be identified. A novel aspect of this research is the inclusion of sociobehavioural risk factors by linking 4 population and public health administrative datasets obtained from the Saskatoon Health Region to the provincial administrative health services data. Sociobehavioral factors are widely accepted as strongly influencing health. Each database was selected because it captures data on a sociobehavioral factor. The Oral Health Database contains data on early childhood development, including early childhood tooth decay, dental health status, and tobacco use in elementary school-aged children. The Integrated Public Health Information System contains data on self-reported ethnicity, the occurrence of an infectious notifiable disease, and behavioural and social risk factors for the notifiable disease. The Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Clinic Data contains data on exposure to and contraction of STIs, as well as referrals given for mental health and/or addiction services. Finally, the Street Outreach Program provides services to individuals living a high-risk lifestyle on the street. Their database contains information on self-reported ethnicity, hypodermic needle exchange, and homelessness. ResultsIn a province of approximately 1.1 million people, we identified 417,724 people as having at least 1 MHA diagnosis, of which two-thirds were depression and/or anxiety. Substance abuse was found in 9.4%, and schizotypal and psychotic disorders were found in 7.9%, of the MHA cohort, ConclusionIndividuals with severe MHA problems account for a disproportionate amount of health care costs. Identifying predictors of becoming an MHA superuser may afford an opportunity to intervene, possibly years in the future, to prevent a person from becoming a superuser. If true, this has significant implications for health care costs, wait times to access health services, and quality of life for this vulnerable population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data Science→Same topicHomelessness and Social Issues→French-language works237,207→