Analyzing the Homodimeric and Heteromeric Nature of the Osmosensory Transporter ProP from Escherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the homodimeric and heteromeric nature of ProP, an H+/solute symporter, from E. coli was analyzed. The measured initial rates of proline uptake via ProP-His6 and His6-ProP indicated that as the growth medium osmolality increased, the assay medium osmolality required for half maximal transport activity (Π½/RT) increased and the maximal uptake rate (Amax) decreased. The oligomeric state of ProP, as determined by Blue Native PAGE, showed that both monomeric and dimeric forms of the transporter were present in wild type and cardiolipin deficient bacteria expressing ProP, ProP-His6 or His6-ProP, after culturing in low or high growth medium osmolality. The BACTH System was used to confirm the homodimeric ProP-ProP interaction and to verify the heteromeric interaction between ProP and YdhP. Initial rates of proline uptake via ProP and Western blots indicated that replacement of the ydhP locus with a kanamycin cassette had no effect on ProP function or expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".