MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2606244019

ORIGIN AND STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING OF THE SACKVILLE SPUR BOTTOM SIMULATING REFLECTOR, OFFSHORE NEWFOUNDLAND

2017· article· en· W2606244019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane Elizabeth Hawken

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineGeologySpurReflector (photography)PaleontologyOceanographyOptics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bottom Simulating Reflectors (BSRs) may represent free gas trapped below gas hydrates or a diagenetic transition such as that of opal-A to opal-CT in biosiliceous sediments. Determination of the origin of BSRs is important because they potentially result from vastly different geological processes. Gas hydrates represent a potential future hydrocarbon source and their dissociation, whether anthropogenic or natural, can result in sediment destabilization. Potential subsequent methane release may contribute to past and future climate change. This study investigates the origin of a segmented BSR imaged on industry-acquired 3D seismic reflection data offshore Newfoundland. The BSR cross-cuts Pliocene and younger contourite drift deposits of the Sackville Spur. The results show that depths to the prominent primary BSR and two deeper, poorly defined BSRs correlate to the theoretical base of hydrate stability depths for hydrates of variable thermogenic gas composition. Gas below the BSR is inferred based on a correlative low velocity zone on the F-09 well log. Effective medium models of these velocities predict minimal free gas concentrations of 0.5% and overlying gas hydrates concentrations of 2 to 10%. Free gas between and underlying the BSRs create amplitude, frequency and phase anomalies along the stratigraphic beds that intersect the BSRs. Based on these observations, the Sackville Spur BSRs are caused by hydrate accumulations. The top of an opal-A to opal-CT diagenetic front is interpreted to occur 365-660 m below the BSR. This diagenetic front is recognized as a high amplitude, faulted, late Miocene reflection that is generated by a dramatic increase in bulk density observed on well logs. Seismic stratigraphic analysis of the 3D volume shows post Miocene deposition was dominated by drift development on the flanks of Flemish Pass. The onset of sediment failures in the Pleistocene correlates to less drift development and increased deposition in the base of Flemish Pass. There is no direct spatial association between the BSRs and MTDs although the onset of pockmarks and failure scarps are stratigraphically equivalent, suggesting hydrate dissociation and sediment failure may have a common triggering mechanism. The Sackville Spur gas hydrate deposit represents a potential geohazard and must be considered during future development of the Mizzen hydrocarbon field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→