MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606275179 · doi:10.36487/acg_rep/1608_08_kemp

Waste landform cover system and geometrical design — integration with waste placement and landform optimisation approach

2016· article· en· W2606275179 on OpenAlexaff
André Kemp, Ian Taylor, Michael O’Kane

Bibliographic record

VenueMine closure · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsInro Consultants (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandformCover (algebra)Environmental scienceComputer scienceRemote sensingGeologyEngineeringGeomorphologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the foremost challenges in mine landform design is the design of stable waste landforms that provide geochemical and geotechnical stability that resist long-term erosion and degradation of cover systems. Surface instability can expose reactive waste and lead to acid and metalliferous drainage, increased sedimentation of downstream waters, cause poor revegetation or related environmental impacts. The landform surfaces are the interface between the mine landform and the surrounding environment and therefore affect long-term environmental impact. This paper focuses on practical design guidance from early concept development through to the quantitative assessments required for detailed design. This extends to discussion on overall geometry of landforms, veneer stability, cover system design and the selection of cover system materials. These factors should be considered together and integrated with internal waste landform design to provide confidence in design, and improve closure outcomes. Surface water is intrinsically linked with surface (in)stability and the landform features, such as cover system selection, plateau grading, selection of embankment profiles and drainage structures, require an integrated approach to ensure that the design meets the stability objectives. Landform cover systems are commonly adopted for closure to manage water and oxygen ingress. In many instances the cover system forms a critical component of the closure solution to limit/mitigate the impacts of acid metalliferous drainage, and to enable rehabilitation success. Cover systems are most effective when developed in unison with the landform construction and geometry to improve the stability of the cover system, to accommodate surface water management features, and to realise efficiency in materials scheduling. Embankment stability is affected by geometry, including slope lengths, gradients and catchments. Longer, shallower slopes have larger catchments and potentially more runoff, whilst shorter steeper slopes have less catchment but (owing to the steep grade) require less energy to mobilise waste. A balance needs to be reached for best performance which is unique for the specific material types and hydrological setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMine closureSame topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207