Clinical Features of Central Neuropathic Pain after Contusive Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the characteristics of the central neuropathic pain (CNP) after contusive spinal cord injury in rats. Method: Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats (30050 g, male) undergone the free-drop contusion injury from the dropheight of 2.5 cm at T10 cord (n=20) and ten rats undergone sham operation (n=10) were subjected to the neurobehavioral analyses by the Basso Beattie Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scales, Touch testTM sensory evaluator (TTSE, North Coast Medical Inc., Canada) and Plantar test (Ugo Basile, Italy) after contusion at the 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28 day. Results: The scores of BBB scales were the lowest at the 1 day and then slowly increased to spontaneous recovery state, but they were significantly lower than those of control group (p＜0.05). The thresholds of mechanical allodynia were significantly increased just after cord contusion, but progressed to decline, and significantly decreased after the 21 day (p＜0.05). The latencies of thermal hyperalgesia were delayed just after cord contusion, but significantly shorter than those of the control group after the 7 day (p＜ 0.05). Conclusion: These results would be helpful for the study of the CNP after contusive spinal cord injury in rats. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2006; 30: 142-147)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".