Subversive Imagination: Smoothing Space for Leisure, Identity, and Politics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter offers an exploration of the dynamics and interrelationships of leisure, identity, and politics in a conceptual framework of spatiality, territoriality, and becoming. Taking the work of Deleuze and Guattari ( Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia , 2009, A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia , 2011) as our guiding philosophical and theoretical orientation, we attempt to provoke a subversive imagination coupled with a pragmatics useful for thinking, feeling, and living differently within our contemporary, late capitalist moment where social, economic, and political powers tend to impinge and subordinate movement toward justice, equality, and equity. Urging geopolitical understandings of identity and encouraging cartographic practices of leisure inquiry, we call for active engagement to smooth the striated space of leisure to engender greater diversity, equity, and justice. Ultimately, this chapter introduces concepts we deem sufficiently forceful, imaginative, and subversive to challenge common conceptions of leisure, identity, and politics and break open possibilities for greater variegation and diversity in how leisure scholarship approaches these concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".