MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606329276 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.109

Maternal age and child development outcomes at age five in Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children: a population data linkage study

2017· article· en· W2606329276 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen Falster, Mark Hanly, Emily Banks, John P. Lynch, Mikaela Jorgensen, Marni Brownell, Louisa Jorm

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyPopulationCohortVulnerability (computing)Poisson regressionPediatricsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT
 ObjectivesAlmost one-fifth of Australian Aboriginal mothers give birth before 20 years of age compared with 3% of non-Aboriginal mothers. We aim to quantify the effect of maternal age at birth on child development outcomes in Aboriginal compared with non-Aboriginal children.
 ApproachThe ‘Seeding Success’ study cohort comprises an almost complete population of children who started school in Australia’s most populous state, New South Wales (NSW), in 2009 or 2012, and were born in NSW, identified by linking Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) data to perinatal and birth registration datasets. Of the 154,936 children in the cohort, 8001 (5%) were Aboriginal. We calculated the risk of developmental vulnerability on one or more AEDC domains by maternal age at birth and Aboriginality. Risk differences and risk ratios (RR) were estimated as measures of absolute and relative inequalities, respectively. Multilevel Poisson regression was used to test the effect of maternal age on child development by Aboriginality.
 Results1383 (17%) Aboriginal children were born to a mother <20 years compared with 4310 (3%) non-Aboriginal children. Among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children, the risk of developmental vulnerability decreased with increasing maternal age up to 35 years; the risk increased for children born to mothers >35 years. Among Aboriginal children, the risk decreased from 46% (95%CI, 39-52) to 31% (95%CI, 24-38) in children born to mothers’ aged ≤16 years to age 35 years, respectively. In non-Aboriginal children, the risk decreased from 38% (95%CI, 33-43) to 16% (95%CI, 15-17) in those born to mothers’ aged ≤16 years to 35 years, respectively. Risk differences and risk ratios for developmental vulnerability between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children increased with increasing maternal age. Compared to non-Aboriginal children born to mothers aged ≥20 years (ref group, RR, 1.0), the RR for developmental vulnerability was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.6-1.9) for non-Aboriginal children born to mothers aged <20 years; 1.6 (95% CI, 1.6-1.7) for Aboriginal children born to mothers aged ≥20 years; and 2.2 (95% CI, 2.0-2.3) for Aboriginal children born to mothers aged <20 years.
 ConclusionChildren born to very young mothers had a high risk of vulnerability regardless of Aboriginality, whereas Aboriginal children had a greater risk of developmental vulnerability across the rest of the maternal age range. Both absolute and relative inequalities in developmental vulnerability increased with increasing maternal age. Early intervention and support services targeted at Aboriginal mothers and their children, regardless of the mother’s age, may reduce this inequality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207