MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606347400

Genotype by Environment Interaction Effects on Starch, Fibre and Agronomic Traits in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

2011· dissertation· en· W2606347400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Bach

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolanum tuberosumStarchHorticultureBiologyGenotypeAgronomyGene–environment interactionSolanumFood scienceGeneGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, the relationships between 17 traits including starch, fibre, culinary quality and agronomic parameters of potato were investigated. In two studies, 12 genotypes were grown at three locations in Ontario and 18 genotypes were grown at four locations in Manitoba, Ontario and New Brunswick. Genotype by environment interactions were significant for fibre and agronomic traits, except bake score and specific gravity. Correlations were found between some, but not all, starch, fibre and agronomic parameters. Several genotypes containing desirable starch, fibre and agronomic profiles with high stability were identified. Although no single genotype was superior in all analyzed traits, certain genotypes excelled in specific attributes. CV96044-3 had the best starch and fibre profile, but low yields compared to other cultivars. Three genotypes, CV96044-3, F04037 and Goldrush, may be useful parents in a breeding program to improve starch and fibre characteristics, producing cultivars containing all desirable traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207