MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606360840 · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2017.04.004

Corrigendum to “Comparative effectiveness of pediatric integrative medicine as an adjunct to usual care for pediatric inpatients of a North American tertiary care centre: A study protocol for a pragmatic cluster controlled trial” [Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. (2017) 12–18]

2017· erratum· en· W2606360840 on OpenAlexafffund
Sunita Vohra, Michael Schlegelmilch, Hsing Jou, Dawn Hartfield, Maria Mayan, Arto Öhinmaa, Bev Wilson, Maria Spavor, Paul E. Grundy

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Clinical Trials Communications · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health EconomicsUniversity of Alberta
FundersWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsAdjunctTertiary careProtocol (science)MedicineCluster (spacecraft)Family medicineAlternative medicineComputer sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.002.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.244
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.244
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1220.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.496
GPT teacher head0.585
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Clinical Trials CommunicationsSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207