MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606399519 · doi:10.1177/000332861709900139

Book Review: Aging Matters: Finding Your Calling for the Rest of Your Life

2017· article· en· W2606399519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican Theological Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRest (music)PhilosophyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging Matters: Finding Your Calling for the Rest of Your Life. By R. Paul Stevens. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans Publishing, 2016.193 pp. $16.00 (paper).What is a calling? Is it different in the years from ages sixty to ninety? How does the journey evolve as we age? How should we face the progressive losses that occur in later life? What is our legacy to be? Does scripture offer special insights for the second half of life? What does God ask of us at this stage? What special joys and challenges does the Christian life present to an elder adult?These are the deep and rich questions presented in Aging Matters: Finding Your Calling for the Rest of Your Life. R. Paul Stevens, professor emeritus at Regent College in Vancouver, has written numerous books that incorporate marketplace theology, the concept that our faith can and should infuse all aspects of our lives, particularly our secular employment. Having stepped away from fulltime teaching several years ago, Stevens in this book turns his attention to the component of vocation in later life.In 2014,55 percent of members of the Episcopal Church were age fifty and above. While many clergy and congregations are laudably interested in attracting families and millennials, the current reality is that our members (like those of denominations) are aging. Too often, he says, almost all seniors ministry is service to aging rather than service from seniors (pp. 109-110). Our older members offer wisdom from a wider perspective, and the gifts of the later years-mentoring, encouragement, prayer, comfort, and counseling, among others, are in particular need at this time of polarized politics and societal distress. Aquinas's spiritual alms deeds (p. 108) are a useful outline for later fife wisdom and ministry.Stevens draws the reader into a study of the older people in biblical stories and parables, demonstrating how their situations and struggles still resound with us today. The chapters on the vices and virtues of aging ring especially true. We would all recognize others and ourselves in the discussion of aging persons whose pride leads us to recite our ailments and disabilities on the one hand, and boast of our fife achievements on the other (p. 87). And then there is sloth; Stevens perplexingly enough reserves special scorn for the (slothful?) perennial traveler, especially cruise passengers, though one might more generously place them in the category of lifelong learner, which he strongly supports. He explicates faith, hope, and love as those virtues that, retooled by disciplines and the circumstances of the later years, allow us to find deeper meaning in life and especially life with God. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it