MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606414611 · doi:10.1109/isplc.2017.7897106

Grid diagnostics: Monitoring cable aging using power line transmission

2017· article· en· W2606414611 on OpenAlexaff
Lena Forstel, Lutz Lampe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandGridElectric power transmissionPower-line communicationComputer scienceTransmission lineLine (geometry)Electronic engineeringPower (physics)Power cableTransmission (telecommunications)Distortion (music)Power gridElectrical engineeringElectrical treeingEngineeringTelecommunicationsVoltageBandwidth (computing)Partial dischargeMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power line communication (PLC) operates on the power line infrastructure to enable data exchange between terminals. In doing so, PLC modems transmit relatively high-frequency and broadband signals through the grid. It is easy to see that the distortion of these signals provides information about the physical properties of grid components affecting the transmission. This is the basis for performing grid diagnostics as a secondary or even as the primary application of PLC. In this paper, we investigate the question whether broadband PLC can be used to detect cable aging, which is an important task for grid maintenance. We apply a physical model for the degradation of serviced-aged cables due to water treeing, and investigate its detectability using channel frequency responses as experienced by PLC signals. The latter is illustrated through the study of frequency-response variations in a small power line network and accomplished through classification with a support vector machine. Our numerical results are encouraging in that some water-treeing degraded and intact cables can be differentiated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207