MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606450556 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201700262

Wettability Alteration and Interactions between Silicon Dioxide (SiO2) Nanoparticles and Reservoir Minerals in Standard Cores Mimicking Hebron Field Conditions for Enhanced Oil Recovery

2017· article· en· W2606450556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsWettingSilicon dioxideNanoparticleSiliconMaterials scienceOil fieldField (mathematics)Chemical engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringNanotechnologyComposite materialMetallurgyGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Economically suitable innovative techniques are becoming a main objective in the oil and gas industry. SiO2 nanoparticle as a water additive for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been gaining grounds during the last few years because of its favourable results at laboratory scale; however, application at field is still unknown. A goal of injecting nanofluids is to promote fluid-rock interaction; therefore, determining the level of interaction between the two is a key factor. This research aimed to study interaction between the 0.01, 0.03, and 0.05 wt% SiO2 nanofluids and standard cores through contact angle experiments; scanning electron microscopy (SEM); mineral liberation analysis (MLA); and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), to predict EOR mechanisms using SiO2 nanofluids in Hebron field. Hebron field is one of the major developments in offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, with an estimation of 2620 million barrels of oil in place, and an objective to achieve first oil in 2017. Berea and Bandera standard cores were selected to represent the mineralogical compositions of Ben Nevis Formation, which is the most important reservoir with approximately 80% of the Hebron’s crude oil. The SiO2 nanoparticles were dispersed in seawater from offshore Newfoundland, and the oil used was from offshore Newfoundland. The contact angle measurements at Hebron Field temperature and pressure (62 °C and 19.00 MPa) showed that the maximum decrease occurred after 6 hours of aging the core plug in nanofluids at 62 °C. Berea core presented a decrease from 51.4° to 30.2°, and in the case of Bandera rock was from 76.7° to 29.6°. SEM images and MLA revealed the higher the SiO2 nanoparticle concentration, the more nanoparticle adsorption on the rock surfaces after aging in nanofluids. These results are complemented by ICP-OES analysis on the nanofluids, since SiO2 nanoparticle concentrations in the nanofluids decreased after aging. The wettability alteration observed may be caused by the nanoparticles adsorption and interaction of the nanoparticle with the rock surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it