PS-02-005 Radiofrequency with Cooling Device to Treat Vaginal Laxity: A Preliminary Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vaginal laxity (VL) is an impactful medical condition that has been understudied. This study investigates the use of a patented cryogen-cooled monopolar radio frequency (CMRF) system that uses surface cooling and energy delivery to provide a non-ablative, minimally-invasive approach to create heat deep w/in vaginal tissue. The objective of this study was too determine the safety and effectiveness of a radio frequency with cooling device to treat the vaginal tissue in women following childbirth to improve VL. A prospective, longitudinal, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-centre clinical study (first and only in the medical literature) was carried out for the treatment of VL. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either the active (90 J/cm2) or sham (≤1 J/cm2) treatment group. Nine sites were chosen in Italy, Spain, Canada and Japan. Subjects were followed up at 72 hrs, 10 days, and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Patient reported outcomes included a 7-point Likert scale assessment for VL as well as a validated sexual function questionnaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".