Bibliographic record
Abstract
HP: the Ottawa Beach area.I have a kind of a personal version.There's, you know, the official version, but my feeling is that Ottawa Beach had its golden era just before and just into the beginning of the 20 th century-really golden era, when the hotel was all developed.I think it was very large.Somewhere I read there were hundreds and hundreds of rooms.GR: It was huge, right.HP: Maybe as many as 600 rooms.Fully developed.And these cottages were all built about that time, and it was a slightly excellent summer resort area.People came from Chicago by ship, and people came here by train, and enjoyed the hotel, and prominent families owned these homes.There were any number of prominent families, names that we know-the Idema family, which really started and owned Steelcase all of those years.They had one of the cottages down here which burned and then later they had another one.I mentioned earlier, the Padnos family owned this place two doors away.An interesting family was the Pantlind family-the famous Pantlind, the well-known Pantlind Hotel in Grand Rapids-which is now, of course, the Amway Grand, was operated by the Pantlind family, and Fred Pantlind was a hotel person.He knew how to manage hotels.He was the person who ran the Ottawa Beach Hotel, and so he had the first house up here on this stretch.GR: Which is still there.HP: Which is still there, belongs to Kronemeyers now.Then he had another one built this side of the big empty lot that's between the two, and that place has stayed in the family, because it's owned by George Whinery and his
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".