Usable authentication systems for real time web-based audio/video communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
User experience and general usability are getting more and more important in system development. Such concerns are especially highlighted when extra security features generate overhead which could easily lead to user frustration. The WebRTC <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sup> standard, as a new multimedia library, endows browsers with universal and stable real time multimedia communication, but it is lacking an authentication system. While it is possible to use common third party authentication services (e.g. from Google, Facebook), these solutions may be too constraining. We have developed a flexible authentication system for a Web-based multimedia communication system using the WebRTC library and the Google channel APIs. It features a user management framework which includes several scenarios of authentication including local as well as cloud-based authentication (e.g. Google and Facebook login). We present different authentication scenarios, and thereafter focus on a study to investigate the degree of usability of the solutions. We propose different authentication solutions for various degree of needs in security requirements in terms of level or user comfort and preferences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".