An investigation of Renyi entropy in high-energy nucleus–nucleus collisions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study of Renyi entropy of shower particles has been carried out using 16 O, 28 Si, and 32 S projectiles in interaction with AgBr and CNO target present in nuclear emulsion at an incident momentum of 4.5 AGeV/c. The analysis reveals interesting experimental observations for both groups of targets. A comparison of the experimental results with the results obtained from analyzing the event sample generated by the UrQMD code is also presented. Renyi entropy values increase with the increase of projectile mass. This increase is weaker in case of CNO target. The calculated values of second-order Renyi entropy H 2 are shown to vary linearly with the logarithm of average particle multiplicity ln⟨n⟩ for both targets. The dependence of Renyi entropy on the logarithm of average particle multiplicity ln⟨n⟩ indicates the presence of long-range correlation in high-energy nucleus–nucleus interactions. The variation is found to be stronger in the case of experimental events in comparison to the UrQMD simulated events indicating stronger long-range correlation for the experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".