La gouvernance locale à l’épreuve de la mouvance territoriale : à propos de l’objet de la gouvernance locale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article veut jeter un nouvel éclairage sur la gouvernance locale, à partir d’un questionnement sur son objet, ce qu’elle est censée orienter. La gouvernance locale vise à façonner, de manière délibérée, interactive et holistique, l’évolution du milieu local. Mais cette gouvernance délibérée peut s’épuiser dans une errance volontariste si elle ne reconnaît pas la gouvernance immanente à la mouvance territoriale, celle qui anime le fonctionnement du milieu local comme sous-système adaptatif complexe et qui se manifeste à travers la multitude des décisions stratégiques de tous les acteurs (simples citoyens tout comme élites locales). Le renforcement de la capacité de la gouvernance délibérée à maximiser son emprise sur la gouvernance immanente suppose un cadre d’analyse adapté à la complexité locale. L’article en propose un, qui met en évidence l’influence de tous les acteurs sur les différentes dimensions du milieu local et leur dynamique, à travers divers registres d’action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".