MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606600338 · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2017.04.002

Determinants of neurological disease: Synthesis of systematic reviews

2017· review· en· W2606600338 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Krewski, Caroline Barakat, Jennifer Donnan, Rosemary Martino, Tamara Pringsheim, Helen Tremlett, Pascal van Lieshout, Stephanie J. Walsh, Nicholas Birkett, James Gomes, Julian Little, Sonya E. Bowen, Hamilton Candundo, Ting‐Kuang Chao, Kayla Collins, James A. G. Crispo, Tom Duggan, Reem El Sherif, N. Farhat, Yannick Fortin, Janet Gaskin, Pallavi Gupta, Mona Hersi, Jing Hu, Brittany Irvine, Shayesteh Jahanfar, Don MacDonald, Kyla A. McKay, Andrea Morrissey, Pauline Quach, Ruksana Rashid, Sabina Shin, Lindsey Sikora, Stacey Tkachuk, Mohamed Kadry Taher, Mingdong Wang, Shalu Darshan, Neil R. Cashman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroToxicology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health ResearchToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkVancouver Coastal HealthOntario Tech UniversityVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisMedicineEtiologyDiseasePediatricsDystoniaSystematic reviewPopulationMultiple sclerosisParkinsonismIntensive care medicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthMEDLINEInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.013
Bibliometrics0.0110.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroToxicologySame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207