MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606610064 · doi:10.21199/wb48.1.6

EXTREME HUMMINGBIRDS: THREE SPECIES NORTH OF THE 55TH PARALLEL

2017· article· en· W2606610064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Doreen Cubie, Fred Bassett

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Birds · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoologyGeographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The occurrence and distribution of the Ruby-throated (Archilochus colubris), Calliope (Selasphorus calliope), and Rufous hummingbirds (S. rufus) in British Columbia and Alberta north of the 55th parallel and east of the Rocky Mountains are poorly known. In 2011, we banded Ruby-throated Hummingbirds as far north as North Star, Alberta (56° 52′ N), and as far west as Charlie Lake, British Columbia (121° 00′ W). In both 2011 and 2014, we also banded Calliope Hummingbirds as far north as Charlie Lake, documenting overlap of the ranges of the Ruby-throated and Calliope hummingbirds in northeastern British Columbia in 2011. We confirmed breeding of the Calliope but not of the Ruby-throated or Rufous hummingbirds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern BirdsSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207