L'expérience et les effets de l'enfermement carcéral des femmes autochtones au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SOMMAIRE Notre étude vise à comprendre l'expérience et les effets de l'incarcération dans les trajectoires de vie des femmes autochtones sous l'angle théorique de la sociologie compréhensive de l'expérience et des travaux français sur l'exclusion sociale.Utilisant la méthodologie qualitative, nous reconstruisons les trajectoires sociocarcérales de sept femmes autochtones au Québec ayant connu des expériences d'incarcération.Il ressort de notre étude que l'incarcération n'intervient pas au même moment dans la vie de toutes les femmes autochtones.Nous avons établi deux groupes de femmes autochtones, soit celles qui sont peu institutionnalisées et dont l'expérience d'incarcération survient relativement tard à l'âge adulte, et celles qui ont un passé de prise en charge par les institutions et chez qui l'expérience de détention survient plus tôt à l'âge adulte.Chez les femmes les moins institutionnalisées (c'est le cas de trois participantes), les premières incarcérations introduisent des ruptures importantes dans leur vie.Résidant pour la plupart en communauté autochtone depuis leur naissance, leur incarcération fait en sorte qu'elles doivent rompre avec leur famille, leur réseau relationnel et quitter leur appartement pour purger leur peine d'incarcération dans les centres urbains.incarceration than to take advantages of those programs in order to make personal changes.Unfortunately, sharing time with women living with similar lfe conditions is sometimes associated with the access to criminal networks generally connected to prostitution, drugs, as well as criminal activities, Such networking also allows them tofindsimilar social networks previously known before incarceration.Resuits suggest that up to the incarceration, the two subgroups are particularly dfferent as it pertains to their lfe conditions.Criminal record has shown to be one ofthe most prominent factors of definitive exclusion from work space within both groups, and has negative effects on access to apartment rental and contributes to exclusion from their respective communities.At first glance, consequences inay appear similar for both groups.However, ii' has a dfferential impact on the two groups: while for the subgroup ofwomen characterized by unstable flfe conditions it is a continuation oftheir c4fflculties, it is a decline of sïtch lzfe conditions for the subgroup ofwomen with more stable lfe conditions.Finally, the idea that their incarceration experience contributes to the marginalization ofthese women must be understood in regards to their previous lfe context and hfe conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".