MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606685661 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.144417

Neutron diffraction and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>SR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> studies of two polymorphs of nickel niobate <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>NiNb</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2017· article· lv· W2606685661 on OpenAlexafffund
Timothy J. S. Munsie, M. N. Wilson, A. Millington, Corey M. Thompson, Roxana Flacau, Chi Ding, Shengli Guo, Zizhou Gong, A. A. Aczel, Huibo Cao, T. J. Williams, H. A. Dabkowska, Fanlong Ning, John E. Greedan, G. M. Luke

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchMcMaster University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesTRIUMFU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNeutron diffractionCrystallographyCrystal structureAntiferromagnetismPhysicsMaterials scienceChemistryCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron diffraction and muon spin relaxation ($\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$) studies are presented for the newly characterized polymorph of ${\mathrm{NiNb}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6} (\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{NiNb}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6})$ with space group ${P4}_{2}/n$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ data only for the previously known columbite structure polymorph with space group $Pbcn$. The magnetic structure of the ${P4}_{2}/n$ form was determined from neutron diffraction using both powder and single-crystal data. Powder neutron diffraction determined an ordering wave vector $\stackrel{P\vec}{k}=(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$. Single-crystal data confirmed the same $\stackrel{P\vec}{k}$ vector and showed that the correct magnetic structure consists of antiferromagnetically coupled chains running along the $a$ or $b$ axis in adjacent ${\mathrm{Ni}}^{2+}$ layers perpendicular to the $c$ axis, which is consistent with the expected exchange interaction hierarchy in this system. The refined magnetic structure is compared with the known magnetic structures of the closely related trirutile phases, ${\mathrm{NiSb}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ and ${\mathrm{NiTa}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$. $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ data finds a transition temperature of ${T}_{N}\ensuremath{\sim}15\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ for this system, while the columbite polymorph exhibits a lower ${T}_{N}=5.7(3)$ K. Our $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ measurements also allowed us to estimate the critical exponent of the order parameter $\ensuremath{\beta}$ for each polymorph. We found $\ensuremath{\beta} =0.25(3)$ and 0.16(2) for the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ and columbite polymorphs, respectively. The single-crystal neutron scattering data give a value for the critical exponent $\ensuremath{\beta} =0.28(3)$ for $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{NiNb}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$, in agreement with the $\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR}$ value. While both systems have $\ensuremath{\beta}$ values less than 0.3, which is indicative of reduced dimensionality, this effect appears to be much stronger for the columbite system. In other words, although both systems appear to be well described by $S=1$ spin chains, the interchain interactions in the $\ensuremath{\beta}$ polymorph are likely much larger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207