An unexpected rash
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously healthy 7-month-old female presented to hospital with multiple raised red papules (3 mm in size) on her left anterior chest, below the clavicle (Figure 1). The lesions were not painful or pruritic, and she was systemically well until later in the evening on the day of presentation when she developed a disseminated maculopapular rash and a low-grade fever. ... She resided in Ontario, with notable travel to Hernando, Mississippi, and Memphis, Tennessee for 10 days approximately 2 weeks prior to presentation. While travelling she spent most of the time indoors. She had not traveled elsewhere in the year prior to presentation. She was continuing to breast feed, and had recently begun taking pureed food. There were no sick contacts, or animal exposures. She was seen in a local emergency department and diagnosed with a viral exanthem. She returned to the same emergency department the following day due to persistent fever. She was hospitalized for suspected dehydration. Complete blood count, liver enzymes, renal function and serum electrolytes were within normal limits. PCR of a lesion swab tested negative for varicella zoster virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".