MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606750779 · doi:10.1107/s2056989017005825

Crystal structure of 2-chloro-1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1,3,2-diazaphospholidine 2-oxide

2017· article· en· W2606750779 on OpenAlexaff
Alex J. Veinot, Arthur D. Hendsbee, Jason D. Masuda

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystal structures of chemical compounds
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySteric effectsMorpholineCrystal structureRing (chemistry)Phosphine oxideAmine gas treatingDihedral angleHydrogen bondStereochemistryCrystal (programming language)Medicinal chemistryAmideCrystallographyPhosphineMoleculeCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title compound, C 26 H 38 ClN 2 OP, was synthesized by reacting phosphoryl chloride with N , N ′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)ethane-1,2-diamine in the presence of N -methylmorpholine which acted as an auxilliary base to quench the HCl released as a by-product. The resultant N -heterocyclic phosphine five-membered ring adopts a half-chair conformation and features a tetracoordinate P atom ligated by the chelating diamine [P—N = 1.6348 (14) and 1.6192 (14) Å], one double-bonded O atom [P1—O1 = 1.4652 (12) Å] and one Cl atom [P1—Cl1 = 2.0592 (7) Å]. The sterically hindered 2,6-diisopropylphenyl (Dipp) groups twist away from the central heterocycle, with torsion angles of −75.66 (19) and 83.39 (19)° for the P—N—C ar —C ar links. A number of intramolecular C—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...Cl close contacts occur. In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds to generate [010] chains. C—H...π interactions are also observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicCrystal structures of chemical compoundsFrench-language works237,207