MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing a Swirl Burner for Pyrolysis Liquid Biofuel (Bio-oil) Combustion without Blending

2017· article· en· W2606754474 on OpenAlexafffund
Sina Zadmajid, Steven Albert-Green, Yashar Afarin, Murray J. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoBioFuelNet Canada
KeywordsCombustorCombustionCombustion chamberPyrolysis oilWaste managementNozzlePyrolysisBiofuelEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChemistryOrganic chemistryMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bio-oil, also called pyrolysis liquid biofuel, is made from the pyrolysis of waste biomass and provides a carbon-neutral alternative fuel. This study focuses on optimizing swirl burners for use with bio-oil. Spray combustion of bio-oil/ethanol blends was previously studied using a 10 kW swirl burner. The previous burner had a small combustion chamber with no refractory lining. It was not feasible to stabilize flames of bio-oil without blending with ethanol, and the pollutant emissions were relatively high. In this study, the burner is upgraded by implementing a refractory-lined combustion chamber and increasing the size of the chamber to investigate the relationship between the burner design and combustion performance of bio-oil. The main reasons for upgrading the burner are to eliminate ethanol addition to bio-oil, stabilize the pure bio-oil flame, achieve lower pollutant emissions, and make the burner more comparable to industrial bio-oil burners. In addition to flame stability, fuel boiling inside the nozzle and nozzle coking are two other challenges that require some optimization and adjustments in the setup. After modification of the new burner configuration and adjustment of the operating parameters, the pure bio-oil flame is stabilized with minimal nozzle coking and gaseous exhaust emissions. The new burner has a significantly lower amount of heat loss and, hence, a higher gas temperature within the combustion chamber compared to the previous burner. The effects of operating conditions on the gaseous pollutants are also investigated. CO and unburned hydrocarbon emissions are extremely sensitive to the operating parameters, such as the equivalence ratio, swirl number, and atomizing air flow rate. Moreover, the pilot flame energy and primary air preheat temperature play important roles in ignition quality of bio-oil, flame stability, and nozzle coking. The dominant mechanism for NO x emissions is the conversion of fuel-bound nitrogen. The new burner also has decreased particulate matter emissions compared to the previous burner by achieving higher temperatures, which favors burnout of char particles within the flame.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207