MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606766152 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2016.11005

BLSTM Recurrent Neural Network for Object Recognition

2016· article· en· W2606766152 on OpenAlex
Yalan Qin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Representation (politics)Recurrent neural networkFuse (electrical)Context (archaeology)Sequence (biology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Artificial neural networkTree (set theory)Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-object relationship information can help eliminate some incorrect combinations or locations of objects. Moreover, it is favorable to extract scene information for object recognition. In this paper, we introduce a new way to generate image representation and propose a deep learning framework to fuse the contextual dependencies among objects and scene information in an image. It adopts a bidirectional long short-term memory recurrent neural network (BLSTM-RNN) to deal with the problem of variable-length sequence produced by local detectors in different images. Then it is applied to the existing tree context model for further recognition. Experimental results on SUN09 dataset show that our model outperforms the state-of the-art object localization methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it