S.M. Volkonsky and the Reform of the System of Honorary Titles of the Imperial Theatrеs Actors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article, based on the archival sources for the first the time introduced into scientific discourse, deals with an attempt to reform the system of honorary titles for the artists of the Imperial theaters undertaken by director of the Imperial Theatres S.M. Volkonsky in 1899-1900. The research is based on the archival sources for the first the time introduced into scientific discourse. In the Russian Empire artists were awarded with two honorary titles: "soloist of His Majesty" and "honored artist of the Imperial theatres". Having taken the position of director, S.M. Volkonsky presented his project "Provisions" to the officials of the Court Ministry, in which he proposed to abolish the title of "honored artist", and to differentiate the "soloist of His Majesty" title and a special badge, which all the artists with the honorary titles had been given since 1895. After criticism by the representatives of the Ministry S.M. Volkonsky presented a new project in which he proposed to establish a two-rank award for the representatives of all kinds of performing arts, in which there would be the lowest level of the title -"honored artist" and the highest -"soloist of His Majesty". However, this project was not adopted as well by two reasons: 1) inappropriateness of awarding dramatic actors with the "soloist" title; 2) impossibility of achieving the first degree of the award after the second one. As a result
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".