MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606827242 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-932-4_12

Closing Thoughts on Philosophy

2017· book-chapter· en· W2606827242 on OpenAlexaff
Hossein Mesbahian, Trevor Norris

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillClosing (real estate)State (computer science)Political philosophySocial philosophyPhilosophyEpistemologyPhilosophy educationModern philosophyWestern philosophySocial contractSOCRATESContemporary philosophyPoliticsLawPolitical scienceSocial changeHistoryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I wish it was true of philosophy that it was such a subversive and disruptive process, but it often has been the opposite. Much of philosophy is state-sustaining philosophy, defending, unconditionally, any kind of authority, ecclesiastic and secular. It depends on what philosophy you think of. Apart from Socrates, an almost mythological figure, when you look at more recent times, the British philosophy of the social contract and of the state of nature, liberal political philosophy beginning with Hobbes, and extending to John Stuart Mill, is very much state-sustaining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207