MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606880902

Solutions: How much do the tiles cost?

2016· article· en· W2606880902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Quebec Fuentes, Matt Switzer

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching Children Mathematics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationClass (philosophy)CurriculumTask (project management)Algebraic numberComputer scienceMathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPedagogyPsychologyEngineeringArtificial intelligencePure mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Algebraic reasoning should be incorporated throughout the K-grade 12 curriculum. The How Much Do the Tiles Cost? problem is a high-level task that fosters algebraic reasoning and problem solving, is accessible to students across the elementary school grades, and can be solved in multiple ways. Rachael Quebec implemented the problem in her first-grade class at Joseph Estabrook Elementary School in Lexington, Massachusetts, providing a window into students' algebraic reasoning in the early elementary grades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.017
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching Children MathematicsSame topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207