MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606933979 · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00157

Quantum Optics Model of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Arbitrarily Shaped Plasmonic Resonators

2017· article· en· W2606933979 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohsen Kamandar Dezfouli, Stephen Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Photonics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's University
KeywordsPlasmonRaman scatteringPhysicsRaman spectroscopyPhotonicsCoherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopyResonatorNonlinear opticsQuantum opticsNanophotonicsClassical electromagnetismQuantumOpticsOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a self-consistent quantum optics approach to calculating the surface-enhanced Raman spectrum of molecules coupled to arbitrarily shaped plasmonic systems. Our treatment is intuitive to use, provides fresh analytical insight into the physics of the Raman scattering near metallic surfaces, and can be applied to a wide range of geometries including resonators, waveguides, and hybrid photonic–plasmonic systems. Our general theory demonstrates that the detected Raman spectrum originates from an interplay between nonlinear light generation and propagation (which also includes the effects of optical quenching). Counterintuitively, at the nonlinear generation stage, we show that the Stokes (anti-Stokes) signal at the molecule location depends on the plasmonic enhancements, through the projected local density of photon states (LDOS), at the anti-Stokes (Stokes) frequency. However, when propagating from the vibrating molecule to the far field, the Stokes (anti-Stokes) emission experiences a plasmonic enhancement at the Stokes (anti-Stokes) frequency, as expected. We identify the limits of the commonly known E 4 electric-field rule for Raman signal enhancement near plasmonic surfaces at low pump powers, as well as a different E 8 rule at high pump powers, and we clarify the role of the LDOS. Our theory uses a generalized quantum master equation where the plasmonic system is treated as an environmental bath that is described through the photonic Green function of the medium. Therefore, any classical electrodynamics-related physics, such as quenching and propagation, are self-consistently included in the model. The presented formalism is also capable of describing the full spatial Raman response in a simple analytical way. This spatial analysis includes both the dependency of the Raman signals at a fixed detector location when the molecule is moved around the plasmonic platform and the dependency of the Raman signal on the detector location. We demonstrate the power of this approach by using a quasinormal mode expansion theory of localized plasmons to construct the photonic Green functions of the plasmonic resonators and explore several different nanoresonator systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS PhotonicsSame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207