Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Test to Measure Strain-Dependent Dynamic Properties of Unsaturated Sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dynamic properties of a clean sand under different degrees of saturation were investigated using a modified custom built Direct Simple Shear (DSS) apparatus at the University of New Hampshire. The specific characteristics of the DSS were presented, and the testing procedures were discussed. The device used the axis translation and tensiometric techniques to control the matric suction in the soil specimen. The investigation on F75 Ottawa Sand showed a decrease in shear modulus and an increase in damping by increasing the shear strain over the tested range of strains for various degrees of saturation: dry, saturated, and partially saturated. The modulus reduction in the applied range of medium shear strains regardless of the degree of saturation demonstrated the capability of the DSS in consistently capturing the changes of dynamic properties. Experimental results indicated that the matric suction can have a substantial effect on the stiffness of the soil. However, the extent of this effect may depend on the induced strain level of the effective stress in unsaturated soil. In addition, partially saturated specimens resulted in lower dynamic compression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".