MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2606965020 · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2694013

Hammerstein System Identification With the Nearest Neighbor Algorithm

2017· article· en· W2606965020 on OpenAlexaff
Włodzimierz Greblicki, M. Pawlak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsNonlinear systemNonparametric statisticsk-nearest neighbors algorithmA priori and a posterioriCascadeAlgorithmConvergence (economics)Rate of convergenceImpulse responseApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nonlinear characteristic in a Hammerstein system, i.e., a system in which a nonlinear memoryless subsystem and a linear dynamic are connected in a cascade, is recovered with the nonparametric nearest neighbor regression estimate. The a priori information is nonparametric, both the nonlinear characteristic and the impulse response are completely unknown and can be of any form. Local and global properties of the estimate are examined. Whatever the probability density of the input signal, the estimate converges at every continuity point of the characteristic as well as in the global sense. We derive the asymptotic bias and variance of the proposed estimate. As a result, the optimal rate of convergence is established that additionally is independent of the shape of the input density. Results of numerical simulations are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207