Evaluation of Building Energy Savings According to the Thermal Performance Experiment of PCM Floor Heating System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a floor heating system utilizing phase change materials to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gases in residential buildings compared to existing floor heating system. PCM floor heating system was developed by inserting PCM modules and PCM aluminium packages between mortar layer and insulation layer. Preferentially, aluminium containers with Phase change materials were analysed to evaluate the potential thermal performance for storing sensible and latent heat. After thermal performance experiment conducted by 3 different melting points of PCM, 37, 41 and 44, building energy saving effects were evaluated through energy simulation (Energy-Plus) of PCM floor heating system which was applied to residential building. The results of simulation were found that RT 44 PCM (melting point is 44) was adequate material to show thermal performance, and total energy was saved about 44.81 kWh, 0.11 kWh per square meter during winter, from October 1 to March 31.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it