MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2607076100 · doi:10.1117/12.2256623

Graphics processor unit acceleration enables realtime endovascular Doppler optical coherence tomography imaging: development and validation (Conference Presentation)

2017· article· en· W2607076100 on OpenAlexaff
Dexter Barrows, Joel Ramjist, Barry Vuong, Kenneth K. C. Lee, Jamil Jivraj, Victor X. D. Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOptical coherence tomographyGraphics processing unitComputer visionOptical flowImage processingSoftwareAccelerationArtificial intelligenceVisualizationImaging phantomComputer graphics (images)RadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endovascular Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) has previously been used in both bench-top and clinical environments to produce vascular images, and can be helpful in characterizing, among other pathologies, plaque build-up and impedances to normal blood flow. The raw data produced can also be processed to yield high-resolution blood velocity information, but this computation is expensive and has previously only been available a posteriori using post-processing software. Real-time Doppler OCT (DOCT) imaging has been demonstrated before in the skin and eye, but this capability has not been available to vascular surgeons. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) can be used to dramatically accelerate this type of distributed computation. In this paper we present a software package capable of real-time DOCT processing and circular image display using GPU acceleration designed to operate with catheter-based clinical OCT systems. This image data is overlayed onto structural images providing clinicians with live, high-resolution blood velocity information to complement anatomical data. Further, we validated flow data obtained in real time using a carotid flow phantom -- constructed using 3D structural OCT data -- and controlled flow from an external pump.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→