MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The use of numerical modelling to determine the stress within early age cemented paste used to backfill an underground stope

2014· article· en· W2607101577 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Veenstra, Murray Grabinsky, W.F. Bawden, B. D. Thompson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoBarrick Gold Corporation
KeywordsInstrumentation (computer programming)Geotechnical engineeringNumerical modelsNumerical modelingSpark plugEngineeringStress (linguistics)Computer simulationCivil engineeringGeologyComputer scienceMechanical engineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The determination of the in situ pressures within a backfilled stope is important for mines looking to move from a plug pour filling strategy to a continuous pouring strategy. This paper presents a methodology developed for the numerical modelling of these pressures. This paper presents the model design criteria, approach methodology, and the input parameters required. Included in the input parameter discussion is a description of the laboratory methods used for determining the input parameters. The results from the modelling of two case study stopes are presented and these results are compared to in situ instrumentation installed in these test stopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207