MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607117265 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2016.11002

Urban Road Congestion Recognition Using Multi-Feature Fusion of Traffic Images

2016· article· en· W2607117265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHistogramArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Traffic congestionComputer visionScale-invariant feature transformGray levelPattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionData miningImage (mathematics)Transport engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traffic congestions happen more and more frequently on the current urban roads. Detecting the congestion rapidly and effectively can avoid the second damages. In this paper, we use the traffic images as data source instead of the videos to detect traffic congestions, which have the advantages of low cost and big probability to be applied widely. Firstly, the interest region of the traffic images are calibrated manually, and then the image features in the interest region are abstracted, including the sift corner, gray histogram variance, gray level co-occurrence matrix of energy and contrast. Finally, BP neural network is used to realize image multi-feature fusion, and to classify the traffic condition described by the traffic images. The simulation results show that the method can recognize the traffic condition with the accuracy of 95%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it