Place des enjeux d’acquisition langagière dans le multi-agenda de l’enseignant de DdNL : l’exemple d’un cours d’histoire pour collégiens allophones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notre contribution étudie, du point de vue de son potentiel acquisitionnel, un cours d’histoire pour élèves allophones en collège. En analysant les séquences métalinguistiques de focalisation lexicale qui jalonnent ce corpus, nous montrons comment, par la conduite des échanges, se construisent et s’articulent les dimensions disciplinaires et linguistiques de l’apprentissage, dans un contexte de communication asymétrique (du point de vue des connaissances en histoire, de la maîtrise de la langue de l’échange, de la familiarité avec l’institution scolaire). Nous nous demandons quels liens de concurrence ou d’étayage se tissent entre les objectifs langagiers et disciplinaires, puis nous resituons la question de la potentialité acquisitionnelle des échanges dans l’ensemble des préoccupations et contraintes qui sous-tendent la conduite de l’interaction didactique par l’enseignant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it