MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607204887 · doi:10.1353/anq.2017.0012

Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy et al.

2017· article· en· W2607204887 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clint Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropological Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyTrope (literature)National identityHegemonyFrenchPoliticsGender studiesLawArt historyMedia studiesHistoryHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy et al. Clint Bruce Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy, Mireille McLaughlin, and Hubert Noël, Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 288 pp. Modern Canada has offered a compelling, if perennially contested, model of official bilingualism and multiculturalist policies, upheld until recently by a robust welfare state. However, as nation-based structures grapple with the forces of economic globalization, how do protected minorities adapt to transformations that seemingly undermine the country's so-called "cultural compact"?1 Ambitiously co-authored by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy, Mireille McLaughlin, and Hubert Noël, Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation examines the adaptation of Francophones from eastern Canada to the changes wrought by the boom in primary resource extraction in the northwestern regions of the country. Their multi-sited team ethnography weaves together fieldwork accounts from New Brunswick, Québec, and Ontario, on the one hand, and, on the other, Alberta and the Northwest Territories, the new frontier for "franco-mobiles" leaving and often returning to the traditional sites of French Canadian identity production. Casting a fresh eye on the now familiar trope—per Gilroy (1993) and Clifford (1997)—of "roots and routes," the book argues that "francophone" Canadians have been constituted as an ethnoclass, "a category that legitimizes class relations on cultural grounds" (26). In doing so, the authors show how the "flows and fixity" of its ethnolinguistic minority citizens are challenging paradigmatic "rooted" nationalism while redefining their relationship to discourses and structures presumedly designed in their interest. [End Page 283] The ethnocultural group on which Heller et al. focus most of their attention is not the Québécois but rather the Acadians, who form their own francophone society in the Atlantic provinces of New Brunswick and, to a lesser extent, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. Acadian culture has been shaped by a particular history of diasporic mobility. Having emerged as a distinct people through a process of settler colonization that began in the early 17th century, the great majority of Acadians—some 14,000—were uprooted by a series of mass deportations implemented by British authorities from 1755 to 1763. Known as the Grand Dérangement, these traumatic displacements, intended as an ethnic cleansing, created a circum-Atlantic diaspora. The best-known Acadian-descended population outside of the Maritimes is the "Cajuns," who were integrated into francophone Louisiana through creolization, then largely Americanized in the second half of the 20th century. A relatively strong diasporic consciousness binds contemporary Acadians with distant relatives in other regions, the commercialization of which, through tourism and cultural products, offers strategies for economic renewal in eastern Canada. One of Sustaining the Nation's strengths lies in its analysis of the new mobilities of the neoliberal age as reformulations of the older displacements that came to define traditional identities, both of Acadie and French Canada more generally. Much of the context needed to understand the ideological stakes of today's "franco-mobilities" is laid out in a lengthy introductory chapter. My initial reading caused me some concern, for I noticed a series of inaccuracies that I feel compelled to point out before highlighting the book's very worthy contributions. Curiously, all of these problems involved Louisiana in one way or another. Firstly, the authors state at the outset that the British deported colonial-era Acadians "to France, England, New England, and Louisiana," thus "reducing possibilities of making a settled nation" (2). With no nitpicking intended, it bears highlighting that Acadians were not deported to Louisiana; this is a popular misconception which tour guides and history professors correct regularly. Instead, as the scattered exiles sought new homes after the end of the Seven Years' War in 1763, a movement emerged among some communities to found a nouvelle Acadie in then-Spanish Louisiana. Initial arrivals began in 1764–1765, culminating in a large wave of nearly 1,600 Acadians from France in 1785. The decision to relocate in Louisiana was a concerted effort, one which...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropological QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207