MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2607204887 · doi:10.1353/anq.2017.0012

Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy et al.

2017· article· en· W2607204887 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clint Bruce

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnthropological Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyTrope (literature)National identityHegemonyFrenchPoliticsGender studiesLawArt historyMedia studiesHistoryHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy et al. Clint Bruce Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy, Mireille McLaughlin, and Hubert Noël, Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. 288 pp. Modern Canada has offered a compelling, if perennially contested, model of official bilingualism and multiculturalist policies, upheld until recently by a robust welfare state. However, as nation-based structures grapple with the forces of economic globalization, how do protected minorities adapt to transformations that seemingly undermine the country's so-called "cultural compact"?1 Ambitiously co-authored by Monica Heller, Lindsay A. Bell, Michelle Daveluy, Mireille McLaughlin, and Hubert Noël, Sustaining the Nation: The Making and Moving of Language and Nation examines the adaptation of Francophones from eastern Canada to the changes wrought by the boom in primary resource extraction in the northwestern regions of the country. Their multi-sited team ethnography weaves together fieldwork accounts from New Brunswick, Québec, and Ontario, on the one hand, and, on the other, Alberta and the Northwest Territories, the new frontier for "franco-mobiles" leaving and often returning to the traditional sites of French Canadian identity production. Casting a fresh eye on the now familiar trope—per Gilroy (1993) and Clifford (1997)—of "roots and routes," the book argues that "francophone" Canadians have been constituted as an ethnoclass, "a category that legitimizes class relations on cultural grounds" (26). In doing so, the authors show how the "flows and fixity" of its ethnolinguistic minority citizens are challenging paradigmatic "rooted" nationalism while redefining their relationship to discourses and structures presumedly designed in their interest. [End Page 283] The ethnocultural group on which Heller et al. focus most of their attention is not the Québécois but rather the Acadians, who form their own francophone society in the Atlantic provinces of New Brunswick and, to a lesser extent, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. Acadian culture has been shaped by a particular history of diasporic mobility. Having emerged as a distinct people through a process of settler colonization that began in the early 17th century, the great majority of Acadians—some 14,000—were uprooted by a series of mass deportations implemented by British authorities from 1755 to 1763. Known as the Grand Dérangement, these traumatic displacements, intended as an ethnic cleansing, created a circum-Atlantic diaspora. The best-known Acadian-descended population outside of the Maritimes is the "Cajuns," who were integrated into francophone Louisiana through creolization, then largely Americanized in the second half of the 20th century. A relatively strong diasporic consciousness binds contemporary Acadians with distant relatives in other regions, the commercialization of which, through tourism and cultural products, offers strategies for economic renewal in eastern Canada. One of Sustaining the Nation's strengths lies in its analysis of the new mobilities of the neoliberal age as reformulations of the older displacements that came to define traditional identities, both of Acadie and French Canada more generally. Much of the context needed to understand the ideological stakes of today's "franco-mobilities" is laid out in a lengthy introductory chapter. My initial reading caused me some concern, for I noticed a series of inaccuracies that I feel compelled to point out before highlighting the book's very worthy contributions. Curiously, all of these problems involved Louisiana in one way or another. Firstly, the authors state at the outset that the British deported colonial-era Acadians "to France, England, New England, and Louisiana," thus "reducing possibilities of making a settled nation" (2). With no nitpicking intended, it bears highlighting that Acadians were not deported to Louisiana; this is a popular misconception which tour guides and history professors correct regularly. Instead, as the scattered exiles sought new homes after the end of the Seven Years' War in 1763, a movement emerged among some communities to found a nouvelle Acadie in then-Spanish Louisiana. Initial arrivals began in 1764–1765, culminating in a large wave of nearly 1,600 Acadians from France in 1785. The decision to relocate in Louisiana was a concerted effort, one which...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,707
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,582

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,010
Communication savante0,0110,007
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnthropological QuarterlyMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207