MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607207765 · doi:10.23907/2012.023

The Armanni-Ebstein Lesion and the Postmortem Diagnosis of Ketoacidosis

2012· article· en· W2607207765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Forensic Pathology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Electricity Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetoacidosisMedicineLesionAutopsyDiabetic ketoacidosisForensic pathologyPathologyDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineEndocrinologyType 1 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diagnoses of ketoacidosis and disturbances of glucose metabolism are difficult at autopsy because of changes in glucose concentrations postmortem. The Armanni-Ebstein lesion is a histological change in the kidney that has been reported as a marker of diabetic ketoacidosis. This paper examines the specificity of the Armanni-Ebstein lesion and the diagnosis of alterations in glucose metabolism and ketoacidosis at autopsy. The Armanni-Ebstein lesion consists of subnuclear vacuolation of the proximal tubules. The vacuoles contain fat and can be demonstrated on fresh and formalin fixed tissue using standard fat stains. Recently it has been reported in other conditions associated with non-diabetic ketoacidosis. The lesion has the same appearance whatever the cause of the ketoacidosis. This review, with illustrative cases shows the Armanni-Ebstein lesion is a marker of ketoacidosis and not specific for diabetic ketoacidosis. It may be seen in cases of diabetic and alcoholic ketoacidosis and in starvation and hypothermia, in which ketoacidosis occurs. It has also been reported in isopropanol poisoning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it