MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607217221 · doi:10.1111/odi.12686

The effect of parotid gland‐sparing intensity‐modulated radiotherapy on salivary composition, flow rate and xerostomia measures

2017· article· en· W2607217221 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Cancer ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UK
KeywordsMedicineParotid glandSalivary glandComposition (language)Radiation therapyIntensity (physics)DentistryInternal medicineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives To describe parotid gland ( PG ) saliva organic and inorganic composition and flow rate changes, after curative intensity‐modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT ) for head and neck cancer ( HNC ), and analyse the relationship between PG saliva analytes and xerostomia measures. Methods and Materials Twenty‐six patients recruited to five prospective phase 2 or 3 trials which assessed toxicity and efficacy of IMRT by HNC subsite, provided longitudinal PG saliva. Salivary flow rate, and subjective and objective xerostomia measures were prospectively collected and saliva tested for inorganic and organic analytes. Statistical comparisons of longitudinal analyte changes and analysis for a relationship between dichotomized xerostomia score and saliva analytes were performed. Results One hundred and forty‐two PG saliva samples from 26 patients were analysed. At 3–6 months after IMRT , stimulated and unstimulated saliva showed significantly decreased flow rate, total protein ( TP ) secretion rate, phosphate concentration and increased lactoferrin ( LF ) concentration. Stimulated saliva alone had elevated LF secretion rate and beta‐2‐microglobulin (B 2 M) concentration with decreased calcium (Ca 2+ ) and magnesium (Mg 2+ ) concentrations and Ca 2+ secretion rate. At >12 months, under stimulated and unstimulated conditions, increased LF concentration and decreased Mg 2+ and phosphate concentration persisted and, in stimulated saliva, there was decreased potassium (K + ) and Mg 2+ concentration. Unstimulated TP secretion rate was lower in the presence of high‐grade xerostomia. Otherwise, no relationship between xerostomia grade and PG salivary flow rate, TP and Ca 2+ secretion rate was found. Conclusion Fewer significant differences in PG saliva analytes >12 months after IMRT indicate good functional recovery. Residual xerostomia after IMRT will only be further reduced by addressing the sparing of subsites of the PG or other salivary gland tissues, in addition to the PG .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it