L’actionnariat salarié au sein des entreprises familiales françaises : rôles et instrumentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente étude porte sur 353 entreprises familiales françaises, cotées sur les marchés réglementés, et tend à confirmer la relation positive entre l’actionnariat salarié et différentes variables de performance. Les réticences exprimées par certains dirigeants d’entreprises familiales à l’égard de l’actionnariat salarié posent alors question. On peut toutefois proposer un modèle explicatif fondé sur la gestion des conflits. En effet, l’actionnariat salarié est plus fréquent en présence d’un bloc de contrôle familial affaibli. Il peut en résulter un phénomène d’enracinement et un risque concomitant de baisse de performance. Dans ces conditions, la performance préalable est une forte incitation pour que les dirigeants d’entreprises familiales acceptent d’endosser délibérément le surcoût entraîné par l’implantation d’un actionnariat salarié, tout en espérant, en contrepartie, une pérennisation du contrôle familial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".